Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blu_Redline
Why would you assume that 0.2 less of a liter would be so much a HP loss?
|
Because it's around 10% of the displacement. That's like making a 350ci into 315, and thinking it's gonna make the same horsepower without major engine work.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blu_Redline
BTW, I never said exact HP between the 2 engines, you did.
|
Maybe I don't get what your're stating above? Because you did say the make the same horsepower. My point all along is that they dont.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blu_Redline
My guess would be that a N/A 2.0L eco is about the same 150+HP
|
[/quote]I have a 1.3L in my '89 Swift GTi that is 102 HP (N/A), so if you extrapolate that out to 2.0L, it would be 156HP[/quote]
Come on now, you know you can't compare engines from totally different years, models, and companies with any accuracy. Honda has 2.0Ls now that are 200hp. My 1.9 in my '02 Saturn was 124hp, if you extrapolate that the 2.0L you have.... well, not much...