Saturn ION Redline Saturn ION Redline Forums

» Wheel & Tire Center

» Sponsors
» Sponsors
Go Back   Saturn ION RedLine Forums > ION Redline Forums > Kills Section

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

RedLineForums.com is the premier Saturn ION RedLine Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2005, 03:34 PM   #31 (permalink)
SuperModerator
 
Sp00ner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 21,492
Here the statement that makes me smile a little too....


No modifications to the cylinder head, block,
main girdle or crankshaft are required.


For 400 hp... so that's a good guarantee that the stock internals, the way the car sits right now, SHOULD be good up to 400ish...
__________________
'05 Stage 2 Redline -One of the few Red REDlines

Sp00n's HP Tuned GM Stage 2, K&N CAI, SFPH 2.8" Pulley, GMPP Exhaust Manifold, B&M Shifter, Eibach Drop, GMPP Rotors, JBP Brake Lines, URC-Subframe, TqForward Strut Bars.



260whp 225wtq
1/4 - 14.0 @ 103.7

Red Red Line Club #001
Sp00ner is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 06-17-2005, 03:37 PM   #32 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sp00ner
Here the statement that makes me smile a little too....


No modifications to the cylinder head, block,
main girdle or crankshaft are required.


For 400 hp... so that's a good guarantee that the stock internals, the way the car sits right now, SHOULD be good up to 400ish...
That would be very nice to achieve those numbers on stock internals!!
SS4ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2005, 03:38 PM   #33 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
SatredL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Plainfield Il.
Posts: 9,905
Yeah spooner I read that manual too & yes it is a confusing read. I was going through the stock to 250 build & kept wondering why you need to add the supercharger.
__________________
'04 Redline in Blue, 6 disc in dash, REDLINE banner in rear window, Front Grille, Anodized exhaust tip, Painted brake calipers,Short Ram Intake, Full 2.5 in exhaust, Flowmaster 40 series muffler.
Join My Mafia: http://apps.facebook.com/inthemafia/...rom=1674373799
Join my Mafia!!!
Blue Army Member
Job Title:Blue Army Tactician
Rank:Blue Army General
SatredL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2005, 03:45 PM   #34 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by SatredL
Yeah spooner I read that manual too & yes it is a confusing read. I was going through the stock to 250 build & kept wondering why you need to add the supercharger.


How did that removing the airbox work out for you? Did you notice any difference? I've been considering doing it to my SS.
SS4ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2005, 03:46 PM   #35 (permalink)
SuperModerator
 
Sp00ner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 21,492
Got a pic of it in the SS? I hear it in a different location...
Sp00ner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2005, 03:58 PM   #36 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
SatredL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Plainfield Il.
Posts: 9,905
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS4ME
How did that removing the airbox work out for you? Did you notice any difference? I've been considering doing it to my SS.
Just glad I'm not part of the Busted Knuckle club. That thing was a tad difficult to get out. Now I think I should have left it in to use as a heat shield for the filter. But I did have some MAF problems, which I hope went away. It's been running fine since monday. I don't have access to a dyno, but with the intake it's not as tourquey, & it seems smoother all the way up through the gears.

Last edited by SatredL; 06-17-2005 at 04:03 PM.
SatredL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2005, 04:09 PM   #37 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Denver CO
Posts: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keebler
...on a side note, i call BS on the van beating the srt....the srt wasnt racing

Actually that van will beat a Z06. It is a wicked modded van , and has the predecessor to the SRT-4 engine in it!!
rip_vw32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2005, 04:40 PM   #38 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Black05Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 324
Arrow



this is what i found in the handbook on the LSJ pistons and rods
__________________
Black05Redline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2005, 06:57 PM   #39 (permalink)
SuperModerator
 
Sp00ner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 21,492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sp00ner
CONNECTING RODS
We recommend that the connecting rods be upgraded
because stock rods are not designed for power levels over 250 hp.

The 2.0L LSJ ECOTEC engine has forged steel rods similar
to Small Block Chevy “Pink Rod.” The forged steel rods are
made of high quality material and have a cap screw 23 mm
small end, and a full floating bronze bushing. These rods are
available through GM under part number 12755126. These
rods require GM Performance Parts piston set part number
88958634 to work with the stock 2.2L crankshaft.
Alternatively, Eagle and Manley both offer a CNC machined H-Beam rod which is an exact replacement for the stock
2.2L rod. (Fig. 48)

PISTONS
The stock 2.2LECOTEC pistons have been tested to power
levels approaching 300 hp. However these pistons should
be replaced with a stock forged-type piston for applications
over the 300 hp level. JE, Wiseco and Diamond offer pistons
in various compression ratios that work for most
applications. We recommend a compression ratio of 9:1 or
less for blown gas applications, and 10-11:1 for normally
aspirated with premium fuel. GM Performance Parts offers
a stock replacement piston that is a direct drop in when used
with the LSJ connecting rod. (Fig. 49)




As far as I can tell here, there nothing about the engine internals being limited at 350hp, I also heard someone else saying the rods could only handle 300hp, but I think people are confusing the fact that they're building a 2.2 in the book, and not starting with the 2.0 LSJ block and internals.
That totally contradicts this statement from the same book... hmmm... I mean, if the 2.2 can handle 300hp, then it dosen't make much sense that the stronger ones can only handle the same amount.... perhaps it's a typo in the parts list??
Sp00ner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2005, 08:03 PM   #40 (permalink)
the HepKitty
 
LittleMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: HepCat City
Posts: 1,754
silly slow and exploding neooons!
LittleMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
the worlds fastest production cars battling it out at the track my_bd Off-Topic Discussion 7 10-29-2005 11:22 PM
Fastest FWD? ballerSS General Discussion 42 10-28-2005 05:04 AM
[B]SRT4 & SRT4 with CAI and EXHAUST[/B] Get_Sum Kills Section 56 08-10-2005 04:01 PM
rl vs srt4????? rdub Kills Section 7 05-14-2005 01:13 PM
New fastest Hemi on tape, 12.1 GreenHemi Kills Section 20 04-25-2005 06:54 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2