Compounding adds heat. If you like heat, then go with that. Otherwise, use two boost controllers.
If you don't know how.... let me know. I'll PM you the diagram I used on the Corrado.
He's also a fucking whiny bitch tool.
Quote this, so he can read it.
I was wondering how many posts it would take to bring this back up. 9.... That is slacking Tyler!
I think it would be easier to build the compounded method. If he finds out that it is too hard to control or too inefficient he could always try your method.
__________________ 06 Silver RL 329whp/290wtqbLaCK and SiLVeR KnIGhTz Member# 5
Whiney bitch tool? Wow, Omega, I am shocked and appalled
Normally, I'd be quite professional... but he doesn't deserve that curtousy.
Long story short, there was a misunderstanding on words... and instead of being a normal human being and ending the discussion, it ended up being an attack on myself. Therefore, he's a tool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMredline
I was wondering how many posts it would take to bring this back up. 9.... That is slacking Tyler!
I think it would be easier to build the compounded method. If he finds out that it is too hard to control or too inefficient he could always try your method.
Meh, the rumors radiating off that thread are retarded. I have a right to be upset.
But about the compounding, it would generate heat. The simple addition of 6 inches of tubing and a boost controller would provide a smooth transition at *near* full boost, and only use the compound at the low end.
The other issue, as previously mentioned in another thread, is that the low pressure - high flow in the intake tube could potentially put the turbo in the choke area.
Although, I should mention, a certain member on here thinks that the choke area is fictional, and only affects cars that are drove on the yellow brick road by leprechauns and gremlins. I, on the other hand, don't like sonic air flow.
Normally, I'd be quite professional... but he doesn't deserve that curtousy.
Long story short, there was a misunderstanding on words... and instead of being a normal human being and ending the discussion, it ended up being an attack on myself. Therefore, he's a tool.
Ya, I was reading from the sidelines. Just surprised to see those words typed by you, lol.
You were wrong, you admitted it, now go back to your little self masturbation corner. Your attitude and conduct are why you are on my ignore list, and obviously - that pisses you off! Yeah, you're not even worth this response, but I'm feeling generous today.
Whine and bitch because you got called out and proven wrong in a technical thread. Yet you have the audacity to say I'm the tool. Did it really hurt so much? Do you weep in the mirror for it? Is your life a shadow of the arbitrary light you previously had here, having people bow before your self-perceived 'knowledge'? That's really what it is, isn't it? You're pissed that people on here can now see that Almighty Omega doesn't know adiabatic efficiency from volumetric efficiency.
It'll be ok, though. Don't go killing yourself just yet! Over the years, many like yourself have developed similar symptoms. There is help out there. It's just a phone call away -
Contact them my friend. They've been helping people like you for years.
In reply to your inane technical 'discussion':
Compounded induction will produce less heat in the system than running the stock blower alone. Go ahead, tell me that the turbocharger pushing 6psi and the eaton pushing 6psi will make more heat than the m62 pushing 14psi alone. The discrepancy only gets more pronounced as you start comparing the M62 @ 20psi vs the compounded turbo/m62 @ 20psi total.
Boosthard, sorry about that - I'll do my best to ignore Omega so he doesn't derail your thread any more than already done. Some people just have no fucking courtesy.
Compounded induction will produce less heat in the system than running the stock blower alone. Go ahead, tell me that the turbocharger pushing 6psi and the eaton pushing 6psi will make more heat than the m62 pushing 14psi alone. The discrepancy only gets more pronounced as you start comparing the M62 @ 20psi vs the compounded turbo/m62 @ 20psi total.
]
Off course the compounded M62 + turbo will give less total heat than a single M62, but when the M62 is switched off the efficiency of the single turbocharger should be even better up top.
Will be interesting to see the different torque curves from a compound M62+T vs. a "boost controlled" M62+T set-up. With compound you should still feel a turbo spooling up, while the controlled set-up should smooth this out completely.
(Oh, and with compound we should multiply the 2 pressure ratios instead of just adding boost pressures. Anybody fancies a compound system with 2 superchargers? )
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.
bLaCK and SiLVeR KnIGhTz Member# 5
)
Linear Mode
