Saturn ION Redline Saturn ION Redline Forums

» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

» Sponsors
» Sponsors
Go Back   Saturn ION RedLine Forums > ION Redline Forums > Performance Modifications

Please Visit our Site Sponsors
RedlineForums.com is the premier Saturn ION Redline forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack (4) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-25-2009, 09:42 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Cat Ion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,425
Stoich is different for E85. So the numbers come out different, I believe.
Cat Ion is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 08-25-2009, 09:53 PM   #12 (permalink)
Moderator
 
GMredline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by laser_racer View Post
some how i am getting lost. i am probably just over looking something but in my eclipse i run 12.0 at wot. and rich is anything more then 11.0 and lean is 13.0 or greater. so i am lost somewheres here.
No. You are on track, for your eclipse.

We like to run a little rich on the LSJ. Most guys like 11.5 - 11.9. So that is pretty much on track with what your used to.

When I was doing my E85 research I found a Subie guy and EVO guy and they ran their E85 converted cars at 11.8-12 (gasoline) afr on their cars. Some guys would lean the car out to 12.2 - 12.5. Again those are afr numbers based of off gasoline calculations.

Instead of changing my stoich afr from 14.7 (gasoline) to 9.765 (E85) AND all my other fuel settings in my tune I left them to the gasoline settings. I also left my wideband to read gasoline afr. It is a very common practice for E85 converts.

When the wideband and your cars rear narrow band calculate afr it is based off of lambda. It then multiplies the lambda readings by the stoich fuel setting in the tune.

NCState said it best.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NCStateRedline View Post
It is the lambda converted to a gasoline stoichiometric readout, which coincidentally is the correct lambda for ethanol (just not reported that way).



so if you were running on gasoline at 12 AFR the lambda would be

λ=12/14.7(the stoichiometric ratio for gasoline)=.816

running ethanol at 7.968 (which zzp did) the lambda would be

λ=7.968/9.765 (the stoichiometric ratio for e85)=.816 (coincidentally the same lambda as running gas at 12)

The readout multiplies lambda by the stoichiometric AFR of the fuel burned to give the readout we're used to and because it was still set for gasoline, it multiplied it by 14.7 and got the 12
I am running a little rich to be safe. That is why my afr is where it is. I should be able to lean the car out for more power. But as I found (on pump gas) the difference in a few afr points is not worth the gains to give up the reliability.
GMredline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 09:57 PM   #13 (permalink)
Moderator
 
GMredline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cat Ion View Post
Stoich is different for E85. So the numbers come out different, I believe.
Yes but lambda is the same. So I left everything set to a stoich setting of 14.7 because that is what I was familiar with. So the numbers come out the same.

Technically, I should change everything in my tune to reflect a new stoich value of 9.765. But I am not that smart. However, I know someone who is and I think we are going to take a look at it soon.
GMredline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 10:36 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Darkmanx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South florida, home of gay redline owners
Posts: 6,309
so you change your tune but you left the reading the same? why switch it to read lamba if your use to reading gasoline.
__________________
BYE BYE 375WHP 302 TQ TVS REDLINE ON STOCK BLOCK
Darkmanx is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 12:30 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
flatgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: A few car lengths ahead of you
Posts: 265
Nice work. It's good to see tech threads with actual tech info every once in a while. Wish e85 was availiable here.
__________________
TVS, 2.8, Exedy hyper single, Big CX/R H/E, DIY single pass, opt b, Devils own stg2, 60#rs, JBP header, 3" stainless cat-back, SS/TC shocks&struts, TWM sts, URC sfc ZZP d/p, intake, S3 H/E stg1 axles, phenolic spacer, FP rewire, 0TTP sway bar, stg2 rotated mounts, steering rack spacers, Killer Chiller, innovate LC-1, 2 step colder plugs, Pedders, FE5 C/A w/spherical bushings, Powerslot rotors, hawk pads
Tuned by Rippin07.


Last edited by flatgod; 08-26-2009 at 12:33 AM.
flatgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 05:55 AM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Watts-Up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MD.
Posts: 11,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMredline View Post
Thanks.

I could only get 19 degrees out of my TVS on the stock pulley and premium fuel (no meth). I am interested to see how it reacts to E85.
Nice work with the heaton I want to see what the tvs will do. So are you finished with the m62 now?
Watts-Up is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 12:37 PM   #17 (permalink)
Moderator
 
GMredline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkmanx View Post
so you change your tune but you left the reading the same? why switch it to read lamba if your use to reading gasoline.
The car/wideband always reads Lambda. Once it has the lambda reading it multiples it by the stoich valve to to determine/display the proper AFR readings.

If it multiplies it by 14.7 or 9.765 I really don't give a dam. But I did not want to deal with all the afr based tables in HPTs to make sure they get updated. So I left everything alone.

Josh is going to going to help me get all the tables updated properly to display/use E85 afr readings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Watts-Up View Post
Nice work with the heaton I want to see what the tvs will do. So are you finished with the m62 now?
The M62 is going back on the shelf. I'll be honest and say I am going to miss the tq from the M62.

2.7" M62 E85 vs 3.15" TVS on Premium 93 octane


GMredline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 10:41 AM   #18 (permalink)
Moderator
 
GMredline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,293
TVS is back on. And I am happy.
GMredline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 11:36 AM   #19 (permalink)
Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 137
Interesting results. From memory I heard that the TVS was 30% larger than the M62. Doesn't seem to be true??
__________________
Zooomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 11:41 AM   #20 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maidstone, SK
Posts: 1,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zooomer View Post
Interesting results. From memory I heard that the TVS was 30% larger than the M62. Doesn't seem to be true??
That's an E85 vs 93 Octane gasoline chart.
I don't think it's an very good comparison of the M62 and TVS.

Wait a few weeks, and we'll see what he comes up with for the TVS on E85.
Omega_5 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.redlineforums.com/forums/performance-modifications/41895-finally-ebs-e85-dyno-results.html
Posted By For Type Date
Finally. EB's E85 Dyno Results - Saturn ION RedLine Forums This thread Refback 11-17-2009 08:28 PM
3800 Engine swap information This thread Refback 11-09-2009 01:54 PM
Getrag 284 This thread Refback 10-16-2009 08:51 PM
What Octane Do You Use In Your 4.0L V6? - Page 8 - Tacoma World Forums This thread Refback 09-01-2009 10:54 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dyno results KruxRedline Off-Topic Discussion 24 10-07-2008 05:53 AM
Dyno Results vick787 General Discussion 3 08-10-2008 01:00 PM
04 RL dyno results. SilverRedLine04 ION Redline Discussion 7 03-20-2006 09:04 AM
Dyno Results... Sp00ner ION Redline Discussion 90 11-15-2005 06:44 PM
dyno results playboy Performance Modifications 8 09-27-2005 03:05 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:49 AM.


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2