![]() |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 955
|
Cobalt SS FE5 Control Arms
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
qwikredline11
on
04-14-2008, 07:59 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
Eco-Mod
on
04-15-2008, 09:21 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
qwikredline11
on
04-15-2008, 09:30 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
my_12sec_saturn
on
04-15-2008, 10:44 PM
|
|
i own a redline and just drove a 08 cobalt and it had just as bad wheel hop as my 04 redline so i dont really see the point of changing out the control arms...and you can get the bushings...you just have to know what your looking for...any pontiac grand prix from like 97-04 control arm bushing will fit in the redline control arms...so instead of spending $315 and not getting rid of the wheel hop issue...spend $25 per bushing and get some bwoody traction bars for like $180...which makes total spending less then $300 and you get rid of the wheel hop...
|
|
BigBrother
on
06-16-2008, 02:48 AM
|
|
I'm thinking that the same people who say this isn't woth it are the same ones - and moreso, since this is more technical, lol - that argue with me about wheel weight being worth the $$ for the ligther rims.
25-30 lbs of unsprung weight is worth a LOT, reduced wheel hop or no, lol. That's freakin' HUGE. ESPECIALLY at the front of the car. Now for the long part - only SCCA types bother from here: I just read, re-read, and read again the ST class rules in the '08 book. I want these control arms, but was pretty sure there's no way I could get them legally (I'm a stickler for rules; if I win in a grey area or that fact that nobody would know it was illegal, I'd still feel like I didn't win 'cuz I cheated). WRONG. THEY ARE LEGAL IN STX. Here's how/why: The ST class definition states that all stock category mods are legal, plus "the additional allowances outlined in sections 14.1 through 14.10. We all know (or you should by now) we can get obscene negative camber in the stock rules with the stock struts. Moving on: Section 14.8, subsection I, paragraph 2 states "On arm-and-strut (MacPherson/Chapman) suspensions, the lower arms may be modified/replaced OR other methods of camber adjustment as allowed by paragraphs 14.8.B, C, or G may be used, but not both." The subsections referenced talk about bushings and alloances for camber plates, and cam bolts. SO: As long as we don't install camber plates or other methods for altering camber beyond the stock setup already allowed by class definition, we can change our lower control arms. Well, the big deal with camber plates or bolts - the use of which would eliminate the ability to use these control arms - is getting more begative camber. With lowering springs and struts or coilovers without camber plates (how do pillowball mounts fit into this definition?), I can still get over 3 degrees negative camber! So I can lower my car with springs and struts, and shave 30 or so lbs of unsprung weight with a stronger, stiffer control arm LEGALLY!! Serious autocrossers who haven't discovered this yet (and SHAME ON YOU if you have and it's not posted all over hell and back), please discuss. This is HUGE, and I am teh stokedz. Starting a new thread actually, in the autocross section, right now. ![]() |
![]() |
Similar Reviews
|
||||
| Review | Review Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How To: Cruise Control Fix!!! | snobrdrdan | Problems & Troubleshooting | 35 | 06-14-2008 01:06 PM |
| **Those who replaced the RL control arms with the SS Supercharged Control arm** | SilverRedLine04 | Performance Modifications | 26 | 09-29-2007 12:12 PM |
| So when doing a compression test the dealer blows 2 of your rocker arms | mrphoto103 | Problems & Troubleshooting | 158 | 04-19-2007 08:47 PM |
| Cobalt Lower Control Arms? | Eagle_f90 | Performance Modifications | 2 | 04-09-2007 11:47 PM |
| 2006 Chevy cobalt engine 16,280k 2.4L ecotec cobalt ss | fullthrottle | Buy/Sell Parts | 15 | 12-27-2006 09:06 AM |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Review: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Review Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|